Litecoin
New Innosilicon A6+ LTC Master 2.2 GHS Scrypt ASIC Miner


16
Apr
2019
Litecoin (LTC) has been doing pretty well lately and no wonder that with the returning user interest in one of the oldest altcoins out there, ASIC manufacturers are also trying to attract new customers for their improved mining hardware. Here comes the new Innosilicon A6+ LTC Master ASIC miner wth PSU included promissing 2.2 GHS Scrypt hashrate at 2100W of power usage ready for shipping at a price of $3000 USD (or 0.613874 BTC or 45.034 LTC with the current prices). Innosilicon A6+ is an enhanced version of last year’s Innosilicon A6 LTC Master with improved performance and energy efficiency. The new Scrypt ASIC miner almost doubles the hashrate with just half of the power usage increase and it is interesting to note that Innosilicon still sells the old A6 miner at a price of $2000 USD without PSU for 1.23 GHS hashrate with 1500W power usage (significantly less than the initial price of $6300 USD it had when announced). Unfortunately running the numbers for the new miner through an LTC mining calculator, while profitable, the profit you can currently get over the power cost isn’t really attractive to really make you want to pull the trigger and get the miner.
Innosilicon A6+ LTC Master Specifications:
– Hashrate: 2.2 Gh/s (+/-5% performance)
– Power Consumption: 2100w ( +/-10%, normal mode, at the wall, with 93% efficiency PSU, 25°C temperature)
– Size: (L)360mm*(W)155mm*(H)247mm (dual tube)
– Net Weight: 9.31KG (without PSU)
– Internet connection: Ethernet
– Ambient Temperature: 0°C to 40°C
– For more details about the new Innosilicon A6+ LTC Master Scrypt ASIC miner…
- Publihsed in: Mining Hardware
- Related tags: A6+ LTC Master, Innosilicon, Innosilicon A6, Innosilicon A6+ LTC Master, Innosilicon Scrypt ASIC, Litecoin (LTC), Litecoin ASIC, Litecoin ASIC miner, LTC, LTC ASIC, LTC ASIC miner, LTC Master, Scrypt ASIC, Scrypt ASIC Miner, Scrypt Miner
Check Some More Similar Crypto Related Publications:


Litecoin
How to earn interest from crypto saving accounts


The cryptocurrency industry has offered developers and investors the opportunity to introduce new financial tools providing plentiful options to earn passive income. Simply holding crypto has offered patient investors the chance to make gains over the years. However, there are various other ways to increase crypto assets’ stacks, even in bear markets.
Other than staking, crypto savings accounts allow retail investors to accrue their funds by earning interest on the crypto assets they deposit on specific cryptocurrency platforms if they agree to lend out their coins or tokens. Crypto interest accounts are particularly appealing because they distribute much higher returns than traditional bank savings accounts, considering that the average interest rate applied by a crypto savings account can be up to 7.5%, against the average 0.06% of bank savings accounts.
Related: DeFi staking: A beginner’s guide to proof-of-stake (PoS) coins
The difference in rates between crypto and traditional savings accounts is somewhat significant but comes with higher risks associated with the service. We’ll find out here how to access crypto savings accounts, the crypto interest rates and deposit terms and the risks associated with this type of financial instrument.
What is a crypto savings account?
A crypto interest account is generally a DeFi platform’s service that lets you earn interest on digital assets you’ve deposited and agreed to lend out in exchange for a return. This service is similar to a bank savings account that will lend out your money to other customers or financial institutions for a certain amount of time and will give you interest for that service.
By definition, blockchain technology encourages users to become self-sovereign and independent from third parties. However, intermediate companies have become a necessary component of the industry providing crypto savings accounts to those who want to enjoy the benefits of the technology without making too much effort to learn complicated and burdensome processes.
Other than convenience, these companies will also hold some of the risks involved and ensure depositors are paid first if adverse events like insolvency occur. Some companies are backed by insurance and work with well-established custodians to protect their customers.
How does a crypto savings account work?
Once you deposit your crypto assets into a savings account, you start accruing interest from day one. Most of the popular cryptocurrencies can be used in a crypto savings account, with the most picked being Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and Litecoin (LTC), while many favor interest rates on stablecoins like Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC) and Pax Dollar (USDP).
By depositing your crypto assets into a savings account, you formally grant the platform the right to use your money for any purpose, from lending it out to investing it or staking it on your behalf. Primarily, it will be used for lending it out to earn high returns, some of which will be paid to you as regular interest payments.
Crypto savings accounts may offer you more favorable rates if you agree to lock up your crypto for a while or hold a platform-specific token. Nexo, for instance, increases interest rates by up to 4% for holders of the platform’s governance token.
How to invest in a crypto savings plan?
When you want to invest in a crypto savings plan, the first step is to pick the right account for you and get started as follows:
- Choose a cryptocurrency platform you trust that offers realistic interest rates;
- Transfer cryptocurrency to this chosen platform;
- Follow the few simple steps to deposit your crypto assets into a savings account. Usually, these steps are straightforward, and you’ll be guided through the process by the platform;
- Choose if you want to deposit your asset for a limited amount of time or select a flexible time that will allow you to withdraw your crypto at any time;
- Start earning interest from the first day.
As mentioned, there are plenty of platforms to choose from, including well-established cryptocurrency exchanges like Coinbase, with the following indications of interest rates on fixed savings:
Binance is the other global popular crypto platform that offers interest rates on many cryptocurrencies with flexible savings and locked savings options:




An increasing number of other financial service companies and cryptocurrency platforms provide these types of accounts. Nexo and Crypto.com are among companies offering greater interest rates to cryptocurrency holders who lock their assets away for weeks or months. However, the drawback with this type of savings account is that you can’t withdraw or sell your crypto during that period.
How much interest you can earn with a crypto savings account largely depends on the platform and the cryptocurrency you choose to deposit. The interest rate offered by the service will also be driven by market conditions and is usually paid out in the cryptocurrency you have deposited.
While their high-interest rates can entice you, you should consider how secure your investment is with them. Choosing the best crypto interest account is not simply a matter of comparing interest rates paid but also making sure your investment is as safe as possible.
Remember, they are custodians of your crypto assets, meaning that by holding your funds, they can even stop you from withdrawing them or delaying the withdrawal process, which may result in a loss for you if the value of the crypto asset changes in the meantime. When choosing the best interest rates, make sure you understand the difference between the annual percentage rate (APR) and the annual percentage yield (APY) because they might mislead you in calculating your yearly returns.
In short, APY includes a compound interest — i.e., the addition of interest to the principal sum of a loan or deposit (the interest on interest accrued). On the other hand, APR does not include compound interest. Due to the compound interest factor, APY will provide a higher return than APR. Yet, it’s always worth reading the savings account’s small print because certain services will pay simple interest only and won’t produce compound interest over time.
Crypto saving account risks
The crypto industry is mostly unregulated, so the investors might not have any cover in case something goes wrong with their assets. In this framework, operate crypto savings accounts that do not offer government-backed deposit insurance like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).
These savings accounts offer higher yields because they are riskier. For example, they could limit how quickly you can withdraw your assets and, in times of difficulties, they might not let customers withdraw their assets at all.
In exchange for these restrictions and the associated risk, these savings accounts are much more interesting for an investor than a typical bank account. However, for these accounts to yield such a high interest which may exceed 20% in some cases, you should wonder how your money is employed in the background.
Like regular banks operate under a “fractional reserve” banking service, so do most crypto companies. They are lending out more than they have to financial institutions with the difference that there is no deposit insurance to back them, as in the case of traditional banks.
Crypto savings accounts vs. crypto wallets
Crypto wallets simply won’t accrue your cryptocurrency holdings as opposed to crypto savings accounts that are conceived to increase the number of coins you own over time.
This might be at the expense of key ownership, though, because the private keys that allow you to access your coins are maintained by the crypto platform. On the other hand, most crypto wallets will ensure you keep full ownership of your private keys.
Security is another concern that should be very well addressed. There are security risks in the centralized platform that holds your private keys because it is potentially at risk of becoming insolvent, bankrupt or being hacked, and you could lose your money.
In the same way, you should choose a wallet carefully to avoid picking a service with little security and a vulnerability to hacking. Also, you must ensure you can easily access your wallet’s private keys if you lose your operational device and need to restore your assets in another digital location.
Cryptocurrency is a work in progress and will likely undergo continuous changes over the years, especially in terms of regulation, which will also affect how crypto savings accounts are managed. In June 2022, the issues of leading crypto lending platforms like Block.Fi and Celsius have raised further concerns over the future of crypto savings accounts and similar related cryptocurrency services.
Related: A step-by-step framework for evaluating crypto projects
Caution and due diligence are always recommended if you consider opening a crypto savings account and weigh the associated risks against the chances of high returns, especially if you risk life savings or anything close to that.
Litecoin
Experts dissect what went wrong


Decentralized finance protocols continue to be targeted by hackers, with Curve Finance becoming the latest platform to be compromised after a domain name system (DNS) hijacking incident.
The automated market maker warned users not to use the front end of its website on Tuesday after the incident was flagged online by a number of members of the wider cryptocurrency community.
While the exact attack mechanism is still under investigation, the consensus is that attackers managed to clone the Curve Finance website and rerouted the DNS server to the fake page. Users who attempted to make use of the platform then had their funds drained to a pool operated by the attackers.
Curve Finance managed to remedy the situation in a timely fashion, but attackers still managed to siphon what was originally estimated to be $537,000 worth of USD Coin (USDC) in the time it took to revert the hijacked domain. The platform believes its DNS server provider Iwantmyname was hacked, which allowed the subsequent events to unfold.
Cointelegraph reached out to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic to dissect how attackers managed to dupe unsuspecting Curve users. The team confirmed that a hacker had compromised Curve’s DNS, which led to malicious transactions being signed.
Related: Cross chains, beware: deBridge flags attempted phishing attack, suspects Lazarus Group
Elliptic estimates that 605,000 USDC and 6,500 Dai was stolen before Curve found and reverted the vulnerability. Utilizing its blockchain analytics tools, Elliptic then traced the stolen funds to a number of different exchanges, wallets and mixers.
The stolen funds were immediately converted to Ether (ETH) to avoid a potential USDC freeze, amounting to 363 ETH worth $615,000.
Interestingly, 27.7 ETH was laundered through the now United States Office of Foreign Assets Control-sanctioned Tornado Cash. 292 ETH was sent to the FixedFloat exchange and coin swap service. The platform managed to freeze 112 ETH and confirmed the movement of funds, according to an Elliptic spokesperson:
“We have been in contact with the exchange, which confirmed a further three addresses that the hacker withdrew funds into from the exchange (these were completed orders that FixedFloat were not able to freeze in time). These include 1 BTC address, 1 BSC Address and 1 LTC address.”
Elliptic is now monitoring these flagged addresses in addition to the original Ethereum-based addresses. A further 20 ETH was sent to a Binance hot wallet, and another 23 ETH was moved to an unknown exchange hot wallet.
Elliptic also cautioned the wider ecosystem of further incidents of this nature after identifying a listing on a darknet forum claiming to sell “fake landing pages” for hackers of compromised websites.
It is unclear whether this listing, which was discovered just a day before the Curve Finance DNS hijacking incident, was directly related, but Elliptic noted it highlights the methodologies used in these types of hacks.
Litecoin
F2Pool co-founder responds to allegations it’s cheating the Ethereum POW system


F2Pool co-founder Chun Wang has responded to allegations that his mining pool has been manipulating Ethereum block timestamps to “obtain consistently higher mining rewards.”
The allegations came from an Aug. 5 paper from researchers at The Hebrew University, claiming the mining pool has been engaging in a “consensus-level” attack on Ethereum over the last two years to gain an edge over “honest” miners.
However, Wang on Twitter responded by saying that “we respect the *consensus* as is”, implying that intentionally exploiting the system’s rules doesn’t necessarily mean that rules have been broken.
We respect the *consensus* as is. If you don’t like the consensus, convince @TimBeiko to send me another Announcement and change it. https://t.co/Lmw2INzOzg
— Chun at 78°N (@satofishi) August 8, 2022
Earlier this week, the researchers shared what they claim has been the first proof of a “consensus-level attack” on Ethereum, in which miners such as F2Pool have found a way to manipulate block timestamps to consistently get higher mining rewards compared to mining “honestly.”
The research paper was penned by cryptocurrency lecturer Aviv Yaish, software algorithm developer Gilad Stern, and computer scientist Aviv Zohar, alleging that Ethereum mining pool F2Pool has been one of the miners that have been using this timestamp manipulation strategy.
“Although most mining pools produce relatively inconspicuous-looking blocks, F2Pool blatantly disregards the rules and uses false timestamps for its blocks,” said Yaish, adding that the mining pool has been executing the attack over the last two years.
Wang also appeared to own up to evidence presented by Yaish, suggestin that the timestamp manipulation was being done intentionally.
I can’t stop appreciate this elegant implementation of what we’ve done over the past two years.
I killed $TRC Terracoin as early as 2013 using a similar timestamp manipulation approach by lower the difficulty to virtually zero. A robust system must withstand all kind of tests. https://t.co/z8pLdLtAU0
— Chun at 78°N (@satofishi) August 8, 2022
F2Pool is a geographically distributed mining pool, which mostly mines blocks on the Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin networks.
How the ‘attack’ works
According to the researchers, Ethereum’s current proof-of-work (POW) consensus laws include a vulnerability that gives miners a “certain degree of freedom” when setting timestamps, which means that false timestamps can be created.
“For example, a miner can start mining a block now, but set the block’s timestamp to actually be 5 seconds in the past, or 10 seconds in the future. As long as this timestamp is within a certain reasonable bound, the block will still be considered valid, according to Ethereum’s consensus laws.”
The ability to create these false timestamps gives these miners an edge in a “tie-breaking” scenario as a miner can replace another miner’s blocks of the same block height by making the timestamp low enough to increase the block’s mining difficulty.
Related: Ethereum Merge: How will the PoS transition impact the ETH ecosystem?
However, the researchers also noted that the vulnerability may be solved after Ethereum transitions to proof-of-stake (POS) after the upcoming Merge on Sep. 19, which utilizes a different set of consensus rules.
“An obvious mitigation technique which will solve both this attack and any other PoW-related one, is to migrate Ethereum’s consensus mechanism to proof-of-stake (PoS).”
“Other solutions which might be smaller in scope and thus easier to implement are to adopt better fork-choosing rules, use reliable timestamps, or avoid using timestamps for difficulty adjustments altogether,” the researchers added.
-
News8 months ago
First ERC-20 Converter Goes Live On Cardano Testnet
-
Blockchain7 months ago
#1 Cam Site BongaCams Launches an Anniversary NFT Collection
-
NFT10 months ago
How NFTs are creating a generational divide between platforms
-
Blockchain9 months ago
AIWORK, the Artificial Intelligence Network for Human Experts
-
NFT10 months ago
Elon Musk reposted 28-year-old’s meme, it sold as an NFT for $20,000
-
Ethereum10 months ago
Secured no. 1 | Ethereum Foundation Blog
-
Investment10 months ago
How Much Crypto Should You Have in Your Investment Portfolio?
-
News10 months ago
Analyst Puts Bitcoin Bottom At $50,000, Here’s Why